Advocates and trainers
Use public-safe examples and structured comparisons for AI literacy, staff training, and internal policy conversations.
Loading EchoCheck
Preparing page…
Controlled-pilot-ready technical preview
EchoCheck helps qualified reviewers compare five AI response modes, apply a 12-dimension DV/IPV-informed rubric, and document what improved, failed, or still needs human judgment. One AI response can reflect many unseen design choices, so EchoCheck helps bring DV/IPV-informed judgment into review before work moves into the private workspace.
Anyone can create a free Advocate preview account to explore EchoCheck’s limited self-service workflow. Controlled pilot access is separate and intended for guided review, expanded workflows, or team/research use cases.
EchoCheck is a learning and AI safety evaluation tool. It is not a survivor support service, crisis response service, or resource referral tool. EchoCheck is also for training, research, product review, policy discussion, and quality improvement; it is not a legal tool, clinical tool, individualized safety-planning tool, or safety certification system.
EchoCheck lens
Review input
The public site does not collect prompts. This is a static preview.
Unconfigured
Guardrails
DV Expert
Stress Test
Custom
Review output
Sensitive work stays in the private app.
Use public-safe examples and structured comparisons for AI literacy, staff training, and internal policy conversations.
Review how prompts and model instructions affect safety, clarity, refusal behavior, and survivor-centered language.
Plan repeatable review workflows for AI responses in survivor-serving scenarios without claiming validation beyond current evidence.
5
response modes
12
rubric dimensions
5
sample preview dimensions
Private
review workspace
Demo preview
The demo page explains scenario setup, five response modes, rubric review, visual comparison, and report workflow without exposing real prompts or survivor information.
Watch demoApp interface previews
These previews follow the same patterns as the EchoCheck app: pipeline cards, module accents, telemetry views, and comparative scoring. They are illustrative, not live evaluation output, and show a sample of the full 12-dimension rubric.
Sequential evaluation pipeline
This public visualization mirrors the app's pipeline cards without exposing prompts, user data, or live evaluation output.
Run progress
80%
4 of 5 modes complete
Step 1
No added safety prompt
Complete
Step 2
Generic safety prompt
Complete
Step 3
Trauma-informed DV/IPV prompt
Complete
Step 4
Unsafe control case
Complete
Step 5
User-defined instructions
Reviewing…
Alignment telemetry preview
The app uses comparative scoring views to show where response variants differ across safety review dimensions.
Three of five modes plotted
Baseline, DV Expert, and Stress test are shown here. The comparative matrix covers all five modes.
Charts are explanatory previews of the review interface. Actual scoring happens only inside the private app.
DV Expert vs Baseline
Comparative matrix
A high-level preview of the matrix pattern used to compare response modes inside EchoCheck.
Swipe sideways to compare all five modes.
Choose your review path
For individual reviewers who want to explore the limited self-service workflow.
Start Advocate previewFor coalitions, researchers, product teams, trainers, or teams reviewing higher-trust workflows.
Request pilot accessFor visitors who want to understand scope, limits, and the review model before entering the app.
Start safety primerPreview vs pilot
Advocate preview is a limited self-service path available through private-app sign-up. Controlled pilot access is a guided/reviewed workflow for higher-trust use cases such as coalition training, research, product review, policy discussion, implementation planning, or expanded access.
How EchoCheck works
Use synthetic, de-identified, training-safe, or public-safe examples rather than survivor-identifying case facts.
Review how different instructions shape language, caution, agency, refusal behavior, and risk.
Use a shared structure to discuss privacy, coercive control, relevance, and harm potential.
Keep the review focused on what improved, what failed, and what needs qualified human review.
Review baseline, safety-tuned, SME-informed, adversarial, and custom outputs in a single guided workflow.
Discuss safety, accuracy, lethality awareness, trauma-informed language, agency, privacy, actionability, coercive control, cultural responsiveness, coverage, relevance, and harm potential.
Create clearer evaluation records for training, research, product review, policy discussion, and quality improvement.
The public site does not collect credentials, prompts, case content, evaluation history, exports, or app state. Authenticated work stays in the app.
Request controlled pilot access for guided or expanded workflows, or start the limited Advocate preview for self-service exploration.
Research and evaluation use only. Not a crisis service, legal service, clinical service, or individualized safety-planning tool. Technical preview for structured review only; not safety certification.